Peer review process
All articles submitted to Acta Numismatica Hungarica are initially assessed by the Editor-in-chief, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for originality, clarity and validity. Article types that are not peer reviewed (e. g. doctoral theses or field reports) will undergo full editorial review by one or more of the editorial team.
ActaNumHung operates a double-blind peer review, meaning that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous unless otherwise requested. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.
Based on the reviewer reports, the Editor-in-chief – supported by the Editorial Board – will make a decision for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance.

Guidelines for authors
The guidelines for submitting manuscripts can be downloaded from here.
Acta Numismatica Hungarica is an open-access journal completely free of charge to authors.

Published online from 2019